On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:32:00 +0100 Antoine Levitt <antoine.lev...@gmail.com> wrote:
AL> What about the case when s1 and s2 are nil? Shouldn't there be another AL> (t (< (length c1) (length c2))) at the end of the second cond ? Am I AL> missing something? Oops. I had it in my original patch but Stefan suggested a change before that line and I accidentally deleted it. Sorry! AL> It seems cleaner to sort two times, instead of once with both AL> predicates, the way it's already done in the code for recently used AL> completions. That seems OK to me. Your patch is cleaner so I'm in favor of using it. Ted ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
