Hello, for the backup as we are also asking PG the last wal name and so
on, changing those name can be a pitfall.
For the restore it shouldn't be a problem, as we restore the list of file
present in the backup. and then PG is doing its stuff when recovering.
On Thursday, 27 March 2025 at 13:16:34 UTC+1 Philippe wrote:
> Well, apparently this fails because bareos is looking for [0-9a-f]{24}
> and ignores the resulting .zst files.
> Okay, I can circumvent that by modifying the commands
>
> > archive_command = 'zstd -q -T0 %p -o /path/to/wal_archive/%f'
> > restore_command = 'zstd -q -T0 -d /path/to/wal_archive/%f -o %p'
>
> Backup works, but didn't test restore yet. Are there any pitfalls to
> expect?
>
> Best,
>
> Philippe
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"bareos-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to bareos-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bareos-users/8f8c877d-bf0a-44ef-9aff-71830449a18bn%40googlegroups.com.
