can somebody give a hint/link on how to compile older client versions for 
Debian systems?

Denis Yesakov schrieb am Sonntag, 28. Mai 2023 um 21:04:11 UTC+2:

> What is the problem to compile on your own?
> You can compile community-checked versions.
> The support is still in the community.
> I made builds of 22.0.3 for aarch and x86 works without problems 
>
> On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 11:22:32 AM UTC+2 Łukasz Szczepanik wrote:
>
>> I got the same impression about the new community repo design. 
>> It seems that from now on I have NO control over the Bareos version 
>> installed on my production server and clients. 
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 11:28 PM Douglas Hammond <wizh...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> After clarification, the "current" release should be stable and is the
>>> same code they use for their subscription builds, don't feel quite as
>>> bad as I did.
>>>
>>> This actually sounds better than bareos's past releases as patches for
>>> the current version were not available without subscription if you can
>>> trust that stabe is actually stable.
>>>
>>> This does have the caveat though "could be upgraded automatically
>>> without my knowledge", which is a very big concern especially for
>>> major versions.
>>>
>>> I get they want to charge for the convenience of their prebuilt
>>> packages as you can build it on your own for linux is easy enough.
>>> BUT the build process for windows clients is not documented and the
>>> closest info is
>>> https://groups.google.com/g/bareos-devel/c/GEXnhQp9y00/m/ZmiPpO4uAwAJ
>>> which is no longer relevant with the updated build system.
>>>
>>> For now, guess I'd build my own for linux on tagged versions and keep
>>> around a copy of the current windows version that was released around
>>> the time of the new tag.
>>>
>>> On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 16:48, JH <maxi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> > I have this problem too ( release/21 recently disappeared).
>>> > After many years with Bareos, it is time to go back to Bacula.
>>> > Very sad and a lot of work
>>> >
>>> > Douglas Hammond schrieb am Dienstag, 9. Mai 2023 um 20:30:15 UTC+2:
>>> >>
>>> >> Thank you for clarifying..
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, 9 May 2023 at 14:20, Frank Kohler <frank....@bareos.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Nope, merely mandatory #legaldisclaimer.
>>> >> > Feature set is equal to subscription repo
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On 5/9/23 19:53, wizh...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Ran into this too.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > "Designed for testing and home environments " and "not for 
>>> production" are unfortunate. Home use is not considered production I guess, 
>>> we need to avoid it for any real backup use at all now.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Sounds like they are on the same path as bacula, which is why I 
>>> switched to bareos in the first place.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 2:51:53 a.m. UTC-4 Willem Basson wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I think we are both out of luck. 
>>> https://www.bareos.com/bareos-release-policy/ explains the what the 
>>> community repos will have from now on.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 8:21:11 PM UTC+2 Willem Basson wrote:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Some clarity about the future of the community repos will 
>>> actually be very much appreciated.
>>> >> >>> release/21 recently disappeared, and we had to switch to 
>>> https://download.bareos.org/release-old-deleteme/21/Debian_11
>>> >> >>> Turns out that was short lived, and release-old-deleteme was... 
>>> you guessed it. Deleted.
>>> >> >>> If we aren't ready for bareos version 22, is our only viable 
>>> option to build debian packages ourselves?
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 at 10:38:24 AM UTC+2 Łukasz 
>>> Szczepanik wrote:
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> Hi,
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> From Bareos 22 version something has changed with packages 
>>> repository location for community repo. The newest community version points 
>>> to "current" location instead of "release/22" like for subscription 
>>> repository.
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> I see a problem with this approach. My Bareos config is fully 
>>> managed by Puppet. If I point repository path to "current" my Bareos config 
>>> could be upgraded automatically without my knowledge if Bareos will release 
>>> new version eg. 23. I want to avoid such situation.
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> Is there any chance that Bareos 22 version and next ones will be 
>>> located in 'release/<version>' in community repo ?
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> Thank you
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "bareos-users" group.
>>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>> send an email to bareos-users...@googlegroups.com.
>>> >> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bareos-users/092efe97-c81c-4329-8d30-7261155ab05dn%40googlegroups.com
>>> .
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > Frank
>>> >> > Bareos GmbH & Co. KG
>>> >> > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Köln | Amtsgericht Köln: HRA 29646
>>> >> > Komplementär: Bareos Verwaltungs-GmbH
>>> >> > Geschäftsführer: Stephan Dühr, J. Steffens, P. Storz
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in 
>>> the Google Groups "bareos-users" group.
>>> >> > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/bareos-users/JWw7RVS8qBg/unsubscribe.
>>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>>> bareos-users...@googlegroups.com.
>>> >> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bareos-users/7feb7457-53e7-ad2b-447f-998ba3866b4b%40bareos.com
>>> .
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Douglas Hammond
>>> >> VA3DJX
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>>> Google Groups "bareos-users" group.
>>> > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/bareos-users/JWw7RVS8qBg/unsubscribe.
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>>> bareos-users...@googlegroups.com.
>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bareos-users/aa0fd89a-3f09-4a71-9d5f-43c4f780ef60n%40googlegroups.com
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Douglas Hammond
>>> VA3DJX
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "bareos-users" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to bareos-users...@googlegroups.com.
>>>
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bareos-users/CAG9T%2BQQh7qj%2BFYArBXngtk5H9Q9vPjZmLTLx1FncEybUZg9N%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com
>>> .
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Lukasz Szczepanik | Site Reliability Engineer
>>
>> lszcz...@opera.com
>> [image: Opera]
>>
>> The information in this email and any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL 
>> INFORMATION and is solely for the attention of the intended recipient. If 
>> you are not the intended recipient, then you have received this message in 
>> error and therefore reading it, copying it, or in any way disclosing its 
>> content to any other person is unauthorized. If you have received this 
>> message in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then 
>> immediately delete this email (including any attachments).
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"bareos-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to bareos-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bareos-users/5acda3be-6824-459b-965d-2b423794e437n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to