On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:58 AM, <st...@lonetwin.net> wrote: > On 2013-09-25 17:21, Dhananjay Nene wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Vineet Naik <naik...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Dhananjay Nene < >>> dhananjay.n...@gmail.com>**wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Dhananjay Nene >>>> <dhananjay.n...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>> [..] >> >>> >>>> which just trashed the ordering of an and followed by a plus followed by >>>> an and. >>>> >>>> >>> This is a more serious problem particularly if the dict is required to be >>> serialized back to xml. >>> >> = = = >> TL;DR. Use domain rather than use cases for exploring data structures >> especially where they can cause a lot of change later. Semantic >> Consistency is important, don't treat it lightly. Impedance mismatch >> can be fragile. If feasible, stay away. >> = = = >> >> > Nice one, Dhananjay ! Thanks for spelling out so clearly what feels > instinctively like common sense at times and is just as easy (and > seductive) > to forget about, at others. >
+1. Thanks for putting it so clearly. - Vineet > > > cheers, > - steve > > [...snip...] > > ______________________________**_________________ > BangPypers mailing list > BangPypers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/bangpypers<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers> > -- Vineet Naik _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
