On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Mandar Vaze / मंदार वझे <mandarv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> before, and I would be interested in your response: >> "What purpose is served by creating a women's group, instead of >> joining the existing group thus making it more diverse?" >> In other words, what purpose is served by intentional segregation? >> > > Was this ever answered ?
Is it very relevant and material to the Bangalore Python Users Group that this question be answered in excruciating detail? If an individual has an affiliation to the idea around which <http://www.pyladies.com/> is derived you'd be already aware of the need. It is also possible that individuals feel strongly that this particular approach might not be a viable one. Either way, there is no reason, within the limits of what I can perceive, that the group proposing to form a PyLadies initiative require to justify their existence. The Python space is large enough to include everyone and, welcoming enough to let all approaches do a very good job of attempting to achieve whatever they want to achieve. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://twitter.com/#!/sankarshan> _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
