It's True. Many companies do have this terminology followed which looks inhuman. Resource itself adjoined with Human seams like a predetermined machine sort off. I found an article few days back in NewYorkTimes related with Indian Education and the way company hire people. http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/23/an-open-letter-to-indias-graduating-classes/ But at the end of the article they frame 5 sets of thoughts which help people to get a job, more than the motive behind the article. It's common in the way we look at the people
--- On Thu, 24/5/12, Senthil Kumaran <sent...@uthcode.com> wrote: From: Senthil Kumaran <sent...@uthcode.com> Subject: Re: [BangPypers] Python/Perl Scripting resource To: "Bangalore Python Users Group - India" <bangpypers@python.org> Date: Thursday, 24 May, 2012, 6:54 PM On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:42:56PM +0530, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > It's an abstraction a lot of companies use for "person employed by the > company". I consider it is dehumanising and have taken some flak for > objecting to the term. Yeah, that's true. Does not quite sound right as I really thought they were looking for book or a website. A resource. More over if I deal with uniform resource locators often, I quite think that way!. :) > > As far as I can tell though, it's here to stay. The hiring staff, in my > experience, take pride in being called the "Human resource" department. Yeah!. That did not strike me at all! How interesting.. -- Senthil _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
