Thank you Navin. Liked the idea of using pinax code for reference. vineet
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Navin Kabra <navin.ka...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Vineet Naik <naik...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am confused whether to use Pinax or just Django. >> > > I've done 3 non-trivial django projects in the last 3 years. I used pinax > for 1 and plain django for the remaining. I would suggest going with plain > django. > > - I think Pinax is not "production" ready. As you've already realized, > pinax needs to be customized before it can really used, and there aren't > enough readymade customization hooks (like django has). So you need to make > changes in Pinax code. This is a nightmare as far as upgrades is concerned > > - Pinax is a great project to get best practices for how to set up your > project. By all means, study the pinax code and copy-paste from there into > your project > > - Incorporate individual apps from Pinax into your project. This is less > painful for upgrades and customization, compared to taking all of Pinax > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Python Pune" group. > To post to this group, send email to pythonp...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > pythonpune+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/pythonpune?hl=en. > -- Vineet Naik _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
