On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Venkatraman S <venka...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves <law...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 01:40 +0530, Gora Mohanty wrote: >> > You must have mistaken me for someone willing to do your homework for >> > you >> > for free. >> >> please watch your tone - this is not ilugd. >> > > Sigh! > > Well, if i had asked you to do my homework, i wouldnt have taken the > hassles of investigating > so much before posting. And wouldn't ask you pertinent Qs w.r.t what you > suggest.
My apologies: My tone was too snarky. We use Imagemagick through the command-line interface, and our demands are nowhere near high enough that I have had cause to investigate memory usage. Also, forgot to mention that Imagemagick does have Python bindings, but they are sadly incomplete. So, going through the command-line via Popen seemed to be the best bet. > If you namedrop, then substantiate it suitably - i.e, suggesting a package > should come with its own reasons, > and you should also be ready to take questions. [...] Sorry, disagree there, and am not sure what exactly you mean by "namedropping". Also, I pointed out a solution to you, and definitely do *not* feel that my obligations extend beyond that. I am not sure where you derive that expectation from. Regards, Gora _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
