On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Senthil Kumaran <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 04:09:26PM +0530, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > > Maybe it shouldn't get ported back. If 2.x becomes as good as 3.x without > > the backward incompatibilities, it's going to hurt adoption. It *is* > after > > Come on. :) It should not be that way. There should be more and more > compatibility between 2x <-> 3x. And improvements do get merged back. Yeah I know. It's not the right way to go about things. However, I do feel that unladen swallow using 2.x as it's base is going to hurt 3.x adoption. -- ~noufal http://nibrahim.net.in _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
