Python widespread adoption is better idea. It's good to have a newer version arrive after a gap, so we can play catchup game. I hadn't still migrated to 3 though, still stuck with 2.6.2. The reason is same as everyone else.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Noufal Ibrahim <nou...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Anand Balachandran Pillai > <abpil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Noufal Ibrahim <nou...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Anand Balachandran Pillai > >> <abpil...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > A.M. Kuchling has published an article related to this on LWN. > >> > This has been under discussion in Pydev for a couple of weeks now... > >> > > >> > It would be interesting to know the opinion of folks here on > this...[..] > >> > >> I've been following the discussion. I think it's eminently sensible. > >> > > > > I also thought so. More than the catching up part, I think perhaps > > Guido is worried about widespread Python 3.x adoption. This will > > help a lot in that direction. > > Unladen Swallow is a serious cog in the works as far as Python 3 is > concerned. I expect the speed boosts to be significant and they're > targetting the 2.x releases. If a public release candidate is ready, > it's a solid argument to *not* migrate to 3.0. I'd love for the > changes to be ported to 3.0 but have no idea of how much work or what > kind is involved which is why I'm itching to have Mahadevan speak this > next Sunday. :) > > > -- > ~noufal > http://nibrahim.net.in > _______________________________________________ > BangPypers mailing list > BangPypers@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers > _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
