http://www.apparatusproject.org/blog/2009/09/twisted-web-vs-tornado-performance-test/
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai < abpil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Anand Chitipothu > <anandol...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> 2009/9/11 Dhananjay Nene <dhananjay.n...@gmail.com>: >> > I am curious about the objective .. to the best of my knowledge wsgi is >> > essentially blocking (unless my understanding is incorrect), whereas >> tornado >> > is primarily non-blocking. So would you see any specific advantages of >> > deploying a wsgi app with tornado ? >> >> yes. quite a lot. In a multi-threaded server, as your concurrency >> increases thread context-switching overhead will become very high. >> Since Tornado uses epoll + callbacks it can handle thousands of >> requests. >> >> Performance Results for helloworld: >> >> tornado: 1414 req/sec >> tornado + web.py: 802 req/sec >> lighttpd + fastcgi + web.py: 354 req/sec >> > > Amazing... I wonder how this compares with twisted/nevow... > > > >> >> Tests were run using: ab -n 1000 -c 25 'http://0.0.0.0:8080/' >> >> Anand >> _______________________________________________ >> BangPypers mailing list >> BangPypers@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers >> > > > > -- > --Anand > > > > > _______________________________________________ > BangPypers mailing list > BangPypers@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers > > -- -------------------------------------------------------- blog: http://blog.dhananjaynene.com twitter: http://twitter.com/dnene http://twitter.com/_pythonic
_______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
