Hello, wt., 28 kwi 2026 o 17:14 Heitor Faria <[email protected]> napisał(a):
> Hello AFM, > > Thank you for writing, though I will be direct: this message contains > several factual inaccuracies, and I would like to correct them for the > list's benefit. > > On legal challenges: No legal concerns have been raised in this thread > that apply to my software. The prior discussion was about the > plugin_license string required by the Bacula FD API — a technical detail I > have already addressed. > This is not a technical detail, but a valid field describing the proper license for the whole product. > That is not a legal challenge; it is a configuration value. > For the Bacula Community you can't legally load the plugin which is not AGPLv3 licensed. You can provide external tools as "full copyright", i.e. I prepared the proprietary (open-source version is available too) tool - IBAdmin which manages Bacula Community without any plugin, just with simple cli execs and sql queries. The plugins are proprietary commercial software. The documentation is > public. Pre-built packages (RPM, DEB, Windows installer) are available for > evaluation. That has been consistent throughout this discussion. > If you distribute this software, or provide services based on a modified version of it over a network, you have an obligation to provide the corresponding source code to the users, unless you have a separate license that permits otherwise. I hope this is clear. -- Radosław Korzeniewski [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
