Hi Mehrdad, OK, thanks for this test and confirmation.
There isn't any directive to speed it up. Increasing timeout value isn't any solution here either. I will check how it could be fixed and let you know. Best regards, Marcin Haba (gani) On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 at 16:36, Mehrdad Ravanbod <mehrdad.ravan...@ampfield.se> wrote: > > Hi Marcin > > Thanks for responding > > U seem to be correct, I tried another backup with a much smaller > filecount (37000 vs 430000) and this time i did got a file list when i > chose SIZE and MTIME, strangely though the sort choice DESCENDING did > not show up, only ASCENDING > > Is there any directive that can fix this or should we wait for a fix in > a future version?? > > Regards /Mehrdad > > On 2025-02-18 10:14, Marcin Haba wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 at 09:37, Mehrdad Ravanbod > > <mehrdad.ravan...@ampfield.se> wrote: > >> I seem to have a problem with the new version of Bacularis, when > >> reviewing a job, one can check the job files and there is a couple of > >> drop down lists that allow us to sort the job files according to size > >> and MTIME, default is just FILE > >> This worked earlier, but on installing a new server with latest > >> bacularis, it seems that the SIZE and MTIME sorting parameters do not > >> work anymore, only the default FILE parameter. Is this a bug in the new > >> version of bacularis (I am running 4.0.0 but i think it could be later, > >> downloaded from bacularis website a couple of weeks ago), or maybe > >> there is something wrong in my installation?? > > Hi Mehrdad, > > > > Thanks for the report. Yes, this sorting on the job files tab is a bit > > specific. > > > > Sorting by mtime and by size requires a bit more time than sorting by > > file. If a job contains many files then this mtime and size sorting > > request can time out and the sorting can not work. > > > > You mentioned that you set up a new server. It can also have meaning > > if it has different parameters than the original server. > > > > I would propose to do a quick test to check if it is this case. Could > > you try to use this function with a job containing a bit smaller > > number of files than this job causing a problem. Is it working now? > > > > Best regards, > > Marcin Haba (gani) > > -- > ________________________________________________________ > > Ampfield Aktiebolag > Mehrdad Ravanbod > System administrator > > _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
