On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 at 09:46, Stefan G. Weichinger <li...@xunil.at> wrote:
> > Sounds great. May I ask why this isn't enabled by default? > Hello Stefan, Yes, it is a good practice and a good idea. I think it isn't enabled by default because not every Bacula user uses the Bvfs restore. > 2nd: I add this to my JobDefs, OK? Did right now. > Great. > I tried to run ".bvfs_update jobid=5252" in bconsole and assumed this > would trigger a cache build for that job. No special activity to see now > ... no postgresql load ... Do I misunderstand here? > It can depend on couple of things, such as: 1) if the .bvfs_update was already called for the jobid (Bacularis restore wizard calls the .bvfs_update too). If yes, it can mean that this jobid is already in cache, so nothing to do for .bvfs_update. 2) if for this job with a given jobid there are many new paths to process. (incremental/differential jobs in most cases are smaller than full) > I will run a job now with the enhanced JobDef, and check > Good luck! Best regards, Marcin Haba (gani)
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
