Hello Everybody, Thanks Rob for this description about Baculum and Bacularis and for kind words :-)
All it is true. Bacularis is dynamically developing and provides more functions. It also has changed internal application architecture that is targeted to easier use without losing all advantages API and Web layers. For the Docker containers, yes, we provide them. It is not the easiest way of using Bacularis because in typical Bacularis (with enabled Bacula configuration capability) is required access to Bacula configuration files. It means that it is difficult to prepare separate containers for Bacula and Bacularis. Nevertheless, I think that people well familiar with Docker can manage it by preparing some mounts for common parts. I also observe projects in Docker Hub led by the community users that provide Bacularis in a separate container. For the Baculum and Bacularis history that Rob asked, we have a History chapter in the documentation. For people interested in, it is here: https://bacularis.app/doc/licenses/history.html Best regards, Marcin Haba (gani) On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 18:55, Rob Gerber <r...@craeon.net> wrote: > I believe that bacula beta version 15.x has changes to baculum in the > release notes. So no, baculum isn't dead, per se. Being found in the bacula > community repositories, baculum seems be the official bacula community web > interface. > > Bacularis is a friendly fork from a baculum developer, Marcin. (Maybe > Marcin is the only baculum developer? I don't know.) Bacularis aims to make > bacula itself more accessible and easier to manage, in addition to various > small changes to the UI. Marcin is active on this list, and I've seen him > commit patches for various bacularis issues very quickly. So I'd argue that > bacularis is better supported in the community, but they do share a common > code base and various features or changes made do make their way between > both projects, in both directions. > > So to answer your question, as far as I know, Baculum isn't dead, and > Bacularis isn't the official bacula project UI. > > I think Bacularis offers more ways to use bacula than baculum does. There > are Bacularis docker containers, extensive installation and setup > instructions. When I go to the baculum site, I don't see anywhere near as > much information on the same subjects. The bacularis Docker containers also > offer various bacula components, something that isn't done with baculum. I > think one of the goals of bacularis is to enable modularizing management of > various bacula components and instances with docker containers. This isn't > the only goal, but it is one thing Marcin appears to have put effort into. > > Please understand that with bacularis you can certainly install it > directly on your server from a repository. It is not necessary to have it > bundled with bacula, or to use it in a docker container. > > Compare https://baculum.app/ and https://bacularis.app/ and you'll see > how the bacularis site has way more information. I'm sure Marcin could shed > more light on the historical reasons why Bacularis exists in a world where > baculum also exists. > > Robert Gerber > 402-237-8692 > r...@craeon.net > > On Fri, May 31, 2024, 10:58 AM <d...@bornfree.org> wrote: > >> >> Is Baculum now a dead project? >> >> Is Bacularis now the official web interface? >> >> --- >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bacula-users mailing list >> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > -- "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." Jesus Christ "Większej miłości nikt nie ma nad tę, jak gdy kto życie swoje kładzie za przyjaciół swoich." Jezus Chrystus
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users