Ah, lovely, I'll take a closer look, thanks.

<Myles>

(613) 703-4152

On 2023-12-05 5:45 p.m., Rob Gerber wrote:

> Regarding Bacularis, I see I made an error in my previous email (and previous 
> testing of the bacularis docker containers!).
>
> Bacularis is available in several flavors of docker containers, including one 
> with all bacula components, and one which only contains the web interface. I 
> clearly must have tested with the wrong container in the past.
> More info on bacularis docker containers here: 
> https://bacularis.app/doc/brief/installation.html#install-using-docker
>
> Regards,
> Robert Gerber
> 402-237-8692
> r...@craeon.net
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:40 PM Rob Gerber <r...@craeon.net> wrote:
>
>> Certainly!
>>
>> You have several options for bacula web gui.
>> There is Bacula-web, which I haven't used so cannot speak to it. I believe 
>> Bacula-web is primarily a reporting tool, and not a control tool. I haven't 
>> examined it closely, so I will have to do so later. Looks interesting. The 
>> developer is on this mailing list!
>> https://www.bacula-web.org/
>>
>> There is Baculum, which is provided and maintained by the bacula project. 
>> Find it in the bacula project repo or your OS repo if that's what you used 
>> to install bacula (I hope you used the bacula project repo).
>>
>> Finally, there is Bacularis, a friendly fork of Baculum. Bacularis makes 
>> some UI changes, and pushes some bugfixes up to Baculum as well. I think the 
>> goal of the Bacularis dev is to make baculum more approachable.
>> I use bacularis, though I have used baculum as well in the past. They are 
>> superficially similar in some ways.
>> Bacularis is available in a docker container, though the docker container 
>> version of the app comes with its own director, sd, and fd. You will need to 
>> modify the container to point to your own bacula installation.
>> I installed bacularis natively (not via container) in rockylinux 9. It 
>> wasn't terribly difficult, as things go. Slightly more involved than merely 
>> issuing a package manager install command and flying along (this is also 
>> true of baculum). Generally after installation of the program, you must 
>> ensure it has appropriate sudoers access to some bacula files, and tell it 
>> where the bacula executables are located.
>> The bacularis developer is also on this list!
>> https://bacularis.app/
>>
>> I personally recommend bacularis, and might advise against using the 
>> bacularis docker container unless you're comfortable modifying its bacularis 
>> instance to point to your bacula install. I might be misguided on the 
>> necessity or difficulty of this, but when I tried the bacularis docker 
>> container it came with its own bacula install, and I didn't want the 
>> complication or potential for error. I'm also not very familiar with docker 
>> containers, and wanted to go with a native install to avoid any surprises.
>>
>> When installing bacularis OR baculum, I personally used lighttpd, though 
>> apache is also supported.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Robert Gerber
>> 402-237-8692
>> r...@craeon.net
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:20 PM MylesDearBusiness via Bacula-users 
>> <bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm not a PHP expert and am looking for a lower barrier to entry.
>>>
>>> Is there a Docker container available holding the entire environment
>>> required by the Bacula GUI that I can hook up to a client server?
>>>
>>> II've already set up director/sd/fd daemons on my cloud server and am
>>> looking for an easier way to manage the system.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> <Myles>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bacula-users mailing list
>>> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to