On 11/7/23 04:34, Lionel PLASSE wrote:
Hello ,

Could  Encryption have any impact in my problem.

I am testing without any encryption between SD/DIR/BConsole or FD and it seems 
to be more stable. (short sized  job right done , longest job already running : 
750Gb to migrate)

My WAN connection seems  to be quite good,  I  achieve transferring big and 
small  raw files by scp ssh and don't have ping latency or troubles with the 
ipsec connection.


So it is fine when the NIC is up. Since this is Windows, the first thing to do is turn off power saving for the network interface device in Device Manager. Make sure that the NIC doesn't ever power down its PHY. If any switch, router, or VPN doesn't handle energy-efficient internet in the same way, then it can look like a dropped connection to the other side.

Also, you don't say what type of WAN connection this is. Many wireless services, 5G, etc. can and will drop open sockets due to inactivity (or perceived inactivity) to free up channels.



I tried too with NAT,  by not using IPSEC and setting  Bacula SD & DIR  
directly in front of the WAN.
And the same occurs  (wrote X byte  but only Y accepted)

I Tried too to make a migration job to migrate from  SD  to SD through WAN  
instead of SD-> FD through WAN and the result was the same. (to see if win32 FD 
could be involved)
  - DIR and SD in the same LAN.
  - Backup remote  FD through  remote SD, the two are in the same LAN to fast 
backup : step OK .
- Then  migration from remote SD to the SD that is in the DIR area through WAN 
to outsource volumes physical support : step nok
The final goal: outsourcing volumes.
I then discard the gzip compression (just in case)

The errors are quite disturbing :
*       Error: lib/bsock.c:397 Wrote 65566 bytes to client:192.168.0.4:9102, 
but only 65536 accepted
         Fatal error: filed/backup.c:1008 Network send error to SD. 
ERR=Input/output error
Or  (when increasing MaximumNetworkBuffer)
*       Error: lib/bsock.c:397 Wrote 130277 bytes to client:192.168.0.17:9102, 
but only 98304 accepted.
         Fatal error: filed/backup.c:1008 Network send error to SD. 
ERR=Input/output error
Or (Migration job)
*       Fatal error: append.c:319 Network error reading from FD. ERR=Erreur 
d'entrée/sortie
         Error: bsock.c:571 Read expected 131118 got 114684 from Storage 
daemon:192.168.10.54:9103

It's look like there is a gap between send and receive buffer and looking at 
the source code, encryption could affect buffer size due to encryption.
So I  think Bacula-SD could be in cause (maybe).
Could it be a bug?
What could I do to determine the problem (activating debug in sd daemon ? )

I use Bacula 13.0.3 on Debian 12 , with ssl 1.1

Thank for helping. Backup scenarios must have an a step of relocating the 
backup media to be reliable.

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to