On 10/24/23 10:59, Justin Case wrote:
Disclaimer: My situation is a little different from yours, I'm doing
disk-to-disk-to-removable-disk.
For tier 1: does it make sense to have different volumes for full jobs
and incr jobs? Does it make sense to have these volumes in seperate
pools, or full and incr together in a pool? Would you recommend having
different pools for different groups of jobs?
I keep Full, Differential and Incremental jobs in separate Pools. That
way I can purge job batches as they become obsolete on their own
schedules and recover the space.
For tier 2: here I wil use copy jobs. Since copy jobs really do not
differentiate full and incr backups, there will be full and incr copies
together in volumes. Would you recommend having different pools for
different groups of copy jobs?
I use copy jobs, but I copy only FULL backups to removable disk. (The
removable disk zpools are then exported, unmounted, and stored
offline/airgapped.)
--
Phil Stracchino
Babylon Communications
ph...@caerllewys.net
p...@co.ordinate.org
Landline: +1.603.293.8485
Mobile: +1.603.998.6958
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
