Heitor, Thank you for the reply.
The backup source is a studio network solutions Evo NAS appliance. Unfortunately, I have no access to run bacula FD, nor most of other things suggested on this appliance as access is only via appliance developer designer means. I do not have any shell access to this appliance. Off the top of my head, I believe my only access options to this Evo NAS are smb (I believe 3.x), read only iSCSI, or afs (apple file sharing - obviously not something I want to try). This Evo NAS appliance is running Gentoo Linux. I am able to transfer data using the Linux cp command at link speeds. I am open to trying anything to see if I can improve these backup times since we have a lot of data to backup (total dataset about 194 TiB). Robert Gerber 402-237-8692 r...@craeon.net On Sat, Sep 23, 2023, 1:24 PM <hei...@bacula.com.br> wrote: > Hello, > > On 9/14/23 15:35, Rob Gerber wrote: >> >> Bacula is transferring data at a fraction of the available link speed. I >> am backing up an SMB share hosted on a fast NAS appliance. The share is >> mounted on the bacula server in /mnt/NAS/sharename. I have dedicated 10gbe >> copper interfaces on the NAS and the bacula server. >> >> > Most likely your bottleneck is the SMB data source. Some documentations > say the protocol has a 30 MBs limitation. I would't use for backup > apllications. > Bacula Clients at the source machine, NFS, CIFS and NDMP are better > options. > I would also use the Linux TCP BBR protocol. > > Rgds. > > > *MSc Heitor Faria (Miami/USA)* Bacula LATAM CIO > mobile1: + 1 909 655-8971 > mobile2: + 55 61 98268-4220 > > [image: logo] <Http://www.bacula.com.br> > bacula.lat | bacula.com.br <http://www.bacula.com.br> > <https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=5561982684220> > > >
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
