Hi I use an lto-9 drive for backup. I activated hardware compression on the tape (i think) but all the logs of bacula show a tape change at 18TB which should be the native (uncompressed) capacity. From experience I would expect a ratio of at last 1:1.2. Is there any way to make sure to use compression (or as last resort activate software compression)?
----- Originale Nachricht ----- Von: Chris Wilkinson <winstonia...@gmail.com> Gesendet: 10.05.23 - 20:49 An: Phil Stracchino <ph...@caerllewys.net> Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Storage protocols advice sought > It is a DLink DNS-325 which locked down so no chance of putting the SD there. > I guess I could reassign the SD uid:gid however that would upset some > existing backups on local disks. > > Best > -Chris- > > > > >> On 10 May 2023, at 19:11, Phil Stracchino <ph...@caerllewys.net> wrote: >> >> On 5/10/23 11:19, Chris Wilkinson wrote: >>> This is not really a Bacula question but I'm hoping someone has come across >>> this when using NFS to mount a NAS storage device. >>> As I understand it, the UID:GID on the remote storage and the local SD >>> daemon must match or permission denied results. My NAS has NFS v3 and this >>> can't be changed. >>> I can create a new user on the NAS but I have no control over what UID:GID >>> it chooses and will not be the same as the SD daemon user:group. >>> I believe NFS v3 doesn't have the capability to map UIDs; that facility is >>> v4 only. >>> Has anyone found a workaround for this? >> >> >> What is the NAS? I'm guessing if you don't have the ability to control >> UIDs/GIDs on the NAS you probably can't install a SD on it directly either. >> NFS-mounting your Bacula backup storage is usually a bad idea unless you >> have no alternative. >> >> Honestly, in my experience off-the-shelf consumer/prosumer NAS appliances >> are utterly horrible from a management perspective — you WILL do things >> THEIR way, or not at all. I tried a consumer NAS a few uears ago — I'm >> blanking on the brand right now — and had to return it because not only was >> it useless for what I wanted, as well as having some pretty ghastly security >> issues. (Like making every file on every share world-read/write via NFS.) >> >> >> If you can't control the UID/GID assigned by the NAS, can you change the >> UID/GID of your storage daemon to match what the NAS assigns? That would at >> least solve the permission problems. >> >> >> -- >> Phil Stracchino >> Babylon Communications >> ph...@caerllewys.net >> p...@co.ordinate.org >> Landline: +1.603.293.8485 >> Mobile: +1.603.998.6958 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bacula-users mailing list >> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Sincerely Yours/Avec mes meilleurs salutations/Yoroshiku onegai-shimasu BRACE GmbH Dr. Thorsten Brandau * Diese Email und die Anhänge sind vetraulich ++ This email and its attachments are confidential * ----------------- Sent from my mobile BRACE GmbH - Dr. Thorsten Brandau - Am Mittelberg 5 - 63791 Karlstein - Germany - www.brace.de
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
