On 11/24/22 06:48, Tomasz Świderski wrote:
I added the SDCallsClient = yes option to make the SD connect to the FD. Unfortunately, it turned out that in this configuration the speed of writing to the archive decreased from 200MB/s to 40MB/s.Does anyone have any experience with SDCallsClient?
Hello Tomasz,The only difference that this option *should* make is that the SD contacts the FD during backups/restores to establish the TCP connection.
Once the connection is made, all other communication/data transfer just uses this socket as it normally would.Can you reliably reproduce this? I mean, when you disable this option on a client, does the speed return, and when you re-enable it does it slow again?
Additionally, are you comparing apples-to-apples? I mean, are you testing the same jobs at the same level against this client? I would run some full job, then run the same full job with SDCallsClient enabled to confirm. But, I can't imagine this option causing any difference in transfer speeds. Best regards, Bill -- Bill Arlofski w...@protonmail.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
