On 5/4/22 08:39, Chris Wilkinson wrote:
Thanks for that Bill. Now I understand why there is the option to specify the pools in the schedules something I always thought unnecessary.I'm still puzzled why the pool clause is required in the job when the full etc is given. Is it just a parser quirk?
Hello Chris, Yes, it is a parser thing.Another example: Even for Copy/Migration jobs a Client is still required, but is not used, nor is it ever contacted. The parser just requires it for a job to be valid. There are many more examples of this. :)
Best regards, Bill -- Bill Arlofski w...@protonmail.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
