On 2/16/22 03:55, Chris Wilkinson wrote:
> Is it possible to define two jobs to use the same schedule resource, i.e. 
> have two jobs to run using the same schedule?
>
> It doesn't seem like that is possible since the schedule resource requires to 
> specify the pools that are used which would
> usually be different. I wonder if there is a logical reason for requiring 
> schedules to define the pools used when this info
> is already in the job resource?
>
> Regards
> Chris Wilkinson

Hello Chris,

I would recommend to remove the pool specification in the Schedule(s), and 
instead use the "FullBackupPool",
"IncrementalBackupPool", and "DifferentialBackupPool" settings in your 
Jobs/JobDefs.

The "Pool" setting is required for a Job, so it must appear in the Job, a 
JobDefs that the Job uses (if it uses one), or the
Schedule (if one is used).

Additionally, if you use the three settings I mentioned above in your Job, the 
Pool setting is still required, but will
always be ignored because one of the other three will automatically override it 
depending on the Level of the job once the
job starts.


Hope this helps,
Bill

--
Bill Arlofski
w...@protonmail.com



_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to