1. AV exclusion did not solve the issue. Backup is still incredibly slow from this client.
I forgot to mention that I am trying to backup a folder which is DFS synchronized. I do not know if it matters or not. During the backup I do not see high cpu or memory utilization on client caused by bacula-fd. It looks like that bacula-fd "cannot find out" what to send to the storage daemon... strage... This is the first time I have such issue... On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 11:19 PM Heitor Faria <hei...@bacula.com.br> wrote: > "1. The windows 2019 server has the default Virus and Threat protection > settings no 3rd party virus scanner is deployed on the server. Can you > recommend what to check? How to exclude bacula-fd?" > > Consult your AV provider to find out. > > "2. This would be a bigger project in our case but sure I will consider > this... " > > The 11.x version (odd) from bacula.org is also open source. Do not > confuse with the Bacula Enterprise Edition (even) versions. > > Rgds. > -- > MSc Heitor Faria (Miami/USA) > CEO Bacula LatAm > mobile1: + 1 909 655-8971 > mobile2: + 55 61 98268-4220 > > América Latina > [ http://bacula.lat/] > > > -------- Original Message -------- > From: Andras Horvai <andras.hor...@gmail.com> > Sent: Monday, November 1, 2021 04:40 PM > To: bacula-users <bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Slow transfer rate - MS Win 2019 > > Hello Heitor, > > How much is very slow? i think on a 1 Gigabit/s connection around 100 > Mbit/s is slow considering that the network test between sd and the client > gives 925.6 Mbit/s - 977.6 Mbtit/s result > (I used bacula to test it) The problem is that when it comes to real > backup it drops to around 100 Mbit/s. > 1. The windows 2019 server has the default Virus and Threat protection > settings no 3rd party virus scanner is deployed on the server. Can you > recommend what to check? How to exclude bacula-fd? > 2. This would be a bigger project in our case but sure I will consider > this... > 3. Well this is something I can take into account as well.... > > > Thanks, > > Andras > > > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 1:47 PM Heitor Faria <hei...@bacula.com.br> wrote: > >> Hello Andras, >> >> How much is very low? >> Bacula only displays the transfer rate after the sw compression >> reduction, what IMHO is very misleading since it is a "higher-the better" >> value. Worst decision ever. >> You gotta divide the ReadBytes by the Job Duration to have the processed >> data rate. >> Anyway: >> >> 1. Please check for Windows AV presence and put the bacula-fd as an >> exception. Try again. >> 2. Update Bacula to the latest 11.0.5 packages from bacula.org, which >> has a few improvements. >> 3. Ultimately, you can manually split the FileSet in the Bacula Community >> edition to paralelize the workload and eventually achieve a better >> performance, specially for Windows different volumes. >> >> Rgds. >> -- >> MSc Heitor Faria (Miami/USA) >> CEO Bacula LatAm >> mobile1: + 1 909 655-8971 >> mobile2: + 55 61 98268-4220 >> >> América Latina >> [ http://bacula.lat/] >> >
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
