Hi, Which OS you choose depends on which one is best suited to your application(s), I just work on that then try and make the ancillary apps fit. If Bacula does not, use a different backup product.
Centos7 is effectively approaching end of life as Redhat kills it off to make you pay, so I wouldnt suggest that OS or say Stream for this reason. Windows 2012 R2 is also end of life so best to migrate that to 2019? and you might need to pay for a Bacula Windows client? (you did in the past) You need to look at this as as Bacula or indeed any application advances 2012 will be left behind. Your problem will be what version of Bacula will work across all of these. In my case I ended up with Bacula on Debian as that was the bulk of my OSes and then had to port Bacula client Centos7 to a compatible version, it was a total nightmare I never got a client for Mac OS to work. regards Steven On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 at 17:20, Marc Ferrand <marcferr...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you had a choice, on which system would you install bacula and why ? > These are OSes I'm familiar with in order or preference : > lint Mint (20, fork of Ubuntu/Debian), CentOS 7 (free version of RHEL), > Windows 10 (Desktop), DragonFly BSD (fork of freeBSD), Windows Server 2012 > R2. > Any advice or suggestion is welcome, thanks in advance, Marc. > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users >
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
