>>>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:19:36 +0100, Uwe Schuerkamp said: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 07:17:17PM +0000, Martin Simmons wrote: > > >>>>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 15:11:30 +0100, Josip Deanovic said: > > > > > > I am not sure if 5M files and directories could account for the > > > attribute spool file of 1.8GB in size. > > > > That is ~400 bytes per file, which is reasonable if the filenames are > > longish. > > > > __Martin > > > > Yep, and given that it's a windows fileserver some very quirky names > are probably par for the course there :-) > > I'm just wondering why I'm seeing this error at all because given > today's disk sizes I'm certain there are many such backup jobs of a > similar proportion run by bacula daily all over the world, and ours > ran fine for a long time, too before I saw this issue for the first > time.
The "wanted" value is much larger than any expected value, so I think it must be caused by a bug and is probably not related to the size of the backup. In fact, the value 1969368434 looks like a fragment of a string because it decodes to the ASCII characters "r-bu" (or maybe "ub-r"). It might also be caused by filesystem corruption on the spool disk, so you could check this with fsck. __Martin _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
