Hi Heitor,

Definitely the same drive :) 
https://www.backupworks.com/Quantum-superloader-3-LTO-8-16-Slot.aspx 
<https://www.backupworks.com/Quantum-superloader-3-LTO-8-16-Slot.aspx> - you 
can see the left and right magazines with the single drive slot in the center. 
Here’s a link to the magazine on the right side 
https://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Superloader-Eight-cartridge-Magazine-Include/dp/B000HWVLX6
 
<https://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Superloader-Eight-cartridge-Magazine-Include/dp/B000HWVLX6>

Really, the only reason for splitting the backups like this is so I can easily 
take the entire magazine off-site once every 2 weeks or so. It’s far faster to 
unload the magazine than it is to unload each tape individually.

If I can pretend that each magazine is a drive, perhaps the built-in one would 
work ?

Cheers
        Simon


> On Jan 4, 2021, at 1:04 PM, Heitor Faria <hei...@bacula.com.br> wrote:
> 
> Hello Simon,
> 
> I never heard of performing backups to alternate TL magazines and any benefit 
> of that. Are you sure you are not talking about different tape drives? 
> Anyway. The Bacula Enterprise Edition earlier versions already perform 
> automatic tape drives round robin usage.
> I believe CBacula V. 11 *might* have this featured ported. You gotta check 
> the code change log.
> 
> Regards,
> --
> MSc Heitor Faria
> CEO Bacula LatAm
> mobile1: + 1 909 655-8971
> mobile2: + 55 61 98268-4220
> 
> América Latina
> [ http://bacula.lat/]
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: Simon Gornall via Bacula-users <bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 03:49 PM
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Bacula-users] Dual-pool backups
> 
> So I’ve just ordered myself a Quantum Superloader-3 LTO-8 tape drive, and I’m 
> planning on using it to back up the home network. Looking around, bacula 
> seemed to fit to a ’T’, but I thought I’d ask if what I’m planning actually 
> *does* fit well :)
> 
> The SL3 has 2 magazines, of 8 tapes each. I think a full backup + 
> incrementals every day will fit onto a single magazine (each is 96TB, 
> uncompressed). The main source is the 112TB NAS, which is where the Macs (5 
> of them) do their Time-Machine backups to, it holds all the movies and photos 
> for the family etc. etc. We’re only using about 50TB of the NAS at the moment.
> 
> The plan then, is to create two pools, each of 8 volumes, and to rotate 
> backups between magazines, so it’ll do:
> 
> Week 1: use Pool 1
> 
> Sun: Full backup
> Mon..Sat: Incr backup // Maybe split this with a differential backup on Wed.
> 
> Week 2: use Pool 2
> 
> Sun: Full backup
> Mon..Sat: Incr backup // Maybe split this with a differential backup on Wed.
> 
> + swap tapes in Pool 1 with offsite ones
> 
> … and repeat, giving me a <current pool>, <previous-week pool> and <offsite 
> pool> in a way that makes it easy to just pull a magazine at a time from the 
> machine and replace it with another. Making backup-related jobs easy to do is 
> the best way I’ve found of them actually happening …
> 
> 
> Looking at the docs, I think I can create a schedule with alternating weeks. 
> I was wondering if there was a better way to do it than:
> 
> Schedule {
> Name = “Monthly”
> Run = Level=Full Pool=LeftMagazine 1st|3rd|5th sun at 21:01
> Run = Level=Incremental Pool=LeftMagazine 1st mon-sat at 21:01
> 
> Run = Level=Full Pool=RightMagazine 2nd|4th sun at 21:01
> Run = Level=Incremental Pool=RightMagazine 2nd mon-sat at 21:01
> }
> 
> It also occurs to me that you could happen to get a backup on the 5th week 
> which used the left magazine, and then switch to the first week of the next 
> month, which would again use the left magazine. I think I could work around 
> that using week-of-year maybe, but then it starts getting to be quite a long 
> config line… 
> 
> Schedule {
> Name = “Monthly”
> Run = Level=Full Pool=LeftMagazine 
> w01|w03|w05|w07|w09|w11|w13|w15|w17|w19|w21|w23|w25|w27|w29|w31|w33|w35|w37|w39|w41|w43|w45|w47|w49|w51
>  sun at 21:01
> Run = Level=Incremental Pool=LeftMagazine 
> w01|w03|w05|w07|w09|w11|w13|w15|w17|w19|w21|w23|w25|w27|w29|w31|w33|w35|w37|w39|w41|w43|w45|w47|w49|w51
>   mon-sat at 21:01
> 
> Run = Level=Full Pool=RightMagazine 
> w02|w04|w07|w08|w10|w12|w14|w16|w18|w20|w22|w24|w26|w28|w30|w32|w34|w36|w38|w40|w42|w44|w46|w48|w50|w52
>  sun at 21:01
> Run = Level=Incremental Pool=RightMagazine 
> w02|w04|w07|w08|w10|w12|w14|w16|w18|w20|w22|w24|w26|w28|w30|w32|w34|w36|w38|w40|w42|w44|w46|w48|w50|w52
>  mon-sat at 21:01
> 
> }
> 
> … but that’s a bit clumsy. Is there any better way to specify alternating 
> weeks ?
> 
> 
> I haven’t actually got the machine yet, so I’m just thinking about how I want 
> to set it up. Any advice much appreciated :)
> 
> Cheers
> Simon
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
> 

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to