Hi David,

Running two jobs on a client takes the FD's CPU utilisation from 100% to 200%, so it does look multi-threaded.

Virtual full backups sounds like a useful alternative - thanks for that. But I am a little nervous of it effectively meaning "incremental forever", as far as the client is concerned.

On a side note, my configuration is in theory pretty verbose: I find myself writing programs to in-line into my configuration files with various @|"" directives to simplify it, or abstract out passwords so that they don't end up in my version control system. Is this unusual?

Cheers,

Mark

On Mon, 27 Apr 2020, David Brodbeck wrote:

I'm not sure two jobs concurrently will work -- I think the FD is
still single-threaded, although someone can correct me if I'm wrong.

My solution was to go to virtual full backups, so that full backups on the
client became a rare event. The heavy job then becomes the virtual full
consolidation, which is strictly a SD and director issue. My chokepoint for
consolidation jobs is currently attribute despooling, which thrashes the
database pretty hard, but it's still a lot faster than a full backup from
the client.

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 9:34 AM Mark Dixon <mark.c.di...@durham.ac.uk>
wrote:

Hi all,

Am I right in thinking that a single bacula job can only back up each file
in its fileset sequentially - there's no multithreading available to back
up multiple files at the same time in order to leverage the client CPU?

I'm a relatively long-term user of bacula (thanks!) who has been happy
backing up relatively small data volumes to disk, but am now faced with a
fairly large directory. "Large" is defined as "takes too long to do a full
dump" and the limiting factor at the moment might be down to software
compression on the client's CPU.

Playing with the compression settings is the obvious approach, but I was
wondering about other options - particularly as I may have a use case for
client-side encryption as well.

If the job stubbornly remains too long to backup, I suspect I'm looking at
splitting the directory across multiple jobs and running them
concurrently.

Is that right?

Thanks,

Mark


_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users



--
David Brodbeck
System Administrator, Department of Mathematics
University of California, Santa Barbara



_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to