The speed that Andrew shows us is Rate: 3721.5 KB / s You must evaluate the network. the speed they trade. the speed of the network ports ....
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 9:10 AM Peter Milesson <mi...@atmos.eu> wrote: > > > On 2020-04-20 12:37, Andrew Watkins wrote: > > Hi, > > Still not having much luck with speed of my Windows backup, so any > pointers? > Even when I used Networker backup windows was slower but not this bad! > > Solaris Client Full: many filesystems > > Elapsed time: 10 hours 31 mins 14 secs > Priority: 10 > FD Files Written: 5,670,614 > SD Files Written: 5,670,614 > FD Bytes Written: 775,767,526,417 (775.7 GB) > SD Bytes Written: 776,760,355,024 (776.7 GB) > Rate: 20482.9 KB/s > Software Compression: None > Comm Line Compression: 75.0% 4.0:1 > Snapshot/VSS: no > Encryption: no > Accurate: no > > Windows Client Full: 2 filesystems with many exclusions (exclude profiles, > etc) > > Elapsed time: 22 hours 39 mins 41 secs > Priority: 10 > FD Files Written: 3,653,666 > SD Files Written: 3,653,666 > FD Bytes Written: 303,603,777,832 (303.6 GB) > SD Bytes Written: 304,379,400,097 (304.3 GB) > Rate: 3721.5 KB/s > Software Compression: None > Comm Line Compression: 30.2% 1.4:1 > Snapshot/VSS: yes > Encryption: no > Accurate: no > > > On 4/3/2020 5:35 PM, Peter Milesson wrote: > > > On 2020-04-01 11:28, Andrew Watkins wrote: > > Hello, > > Just started using Bacula and at this time (early stages) I find my > UNIX/Solaris full backups are running at a good speed, but our window > server is slow. There is a chance it is just the number of files (Yes, I am > ignoring profiles). My questions: > > 1) I have added "Maximum Concurrent Jobs" to my clients FileDaemon, but is > there a way to prove that Windows client is using it? > > 2) Any web links to how I can monitor a client backup, to examine what is > happening. > > Thanks > > Andrew > > Hi Andrew, > > When you brought it up, I had a look at my setup. I'm backing up both > Linux and Windows servers. > > The Linux server backups are running at about 30 Mbyte/s (2x1Gbit NICs) > with line compression, whereas the Windows server backups are running at > about 22 Mbytes/s (2x10Gbit NICs) without compression. The connection is 10 > Gbit from all servers to the Bacula backup server. The values mentioned are > for full monthly server backups (a couple of TBs). > > What I did notice however, is that small incremental backups are an order > of magnitude slower for the Windows servers, compared to the Linux servers. > > I'm not going to speculate, but compression would probably speed up things > somewhat for the Windows backups, however not significantly. Also, VSS > snapshots under Windows may have a huge impact on the overall performance > for smaller backup sets. > > For me, the current performance is sufficient, but there is certainly lots > of room for tweaking. I've been running this setup for about 9 years now, > just improving the hardware now and then. Don't fix what's working... > > Best regards, > > Peter > > > > Thanks, > > Andrew > > Hi Andrew, > > Here's part of the log from one Windows server, the total volume is quite > similar to yours, but you seem to have got much smaller files: > > Elapsed time: 3 hours 57 mins 51 secs > Priority: 10 > FD Files Written: 368,404 > SD Files Written: 368,404 > FD Bytes Written: 318,235,741,624 (318.2 GB) > SD Bytes Written: 318,313,424,664 (318.3 GB) > Rate: 22299.5 KB/s > Software Compression: None > Comm Line Compression: None > Snapshot/VSS: yes > Encryption: no > Accurate: no > > > The server is a HPE ProLiant DL-180 Gen9 with SAS-drives (15000 rpm) in > RAID-5, Windows 2016 > > A couple of points to look at: > > - Network performance (I have got a 10Gbit link directly from the > server, so compression probably doesn't make sense) > - Storage performance (I have got 4 SATA disks (7200 rpm) in RAID 10 > as virtual tapes) > > I have noticed a similar performance as yours when making incremental > backups, but those backups are less than 10Gb in volume. > > Best regards, > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > -- ############################# # Sistema Operativo: Debian # # Caracas, Venezuela # #############################
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
