Hello Jason, > Hello guys, I hope you're doing well > > I have a question: So far, which is the best combination for storing > backups on S3 using Bacula? Is it through the new Cloud plugin? or is > it best to use the Amazon VTL integration with Bacula? Which of these > is the more reliable for production environments? Which one would you > use? > > My scenario seems to be simple enough: I need to backup data from > several EC2 instances using Bacula and Amazon S3, both (EC2 and S3) in > the same region. So bandwidth and data transfer pricing wouldn't be an > issue for me. > > I hope someone can share his experiences and/or recommendations.
Why would you add an emulation/extra layer between Bacula and the final destination? Bacula S3 Plugin is really good. It provides nice options such as upload behavior, cache and Bacula volume fine parts to make the transference more granular. If your solution grows and you need heavy support on that, you can always upgrade to the Enterprise Bacula in the future, which is compatible. > Thanks in advance for your help, bats! Regards, > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- MSc Heitor Faria CEO Bacula LATAM mobile1: + 1 909 655-8971 mobile2: + 55 61 98268-4220 [ https://www.linkedin.com/in/msc-heitor-faria-5ba51b3 ] [ http://www.bacula.com.br/ ] América Latina [ http://bacula.lat/ | bacula.lat ] | [ http://www.bacula.com.br/ | bacula.com.br ] _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
