Hello Davide Why the paths for the packages are so strange?
This is the path address for see the Debian packages: https://www.bacula.org/packages/XXXXXXXXXXXXX/debs/9.4.3/stretch/amd64/dists/stretch/main/binary-amd64/ I guess this part of path is in "duplicity" "dists/stretch/main/binary-amd64/" It's totally different from what's in the manual: https://blog.bacula.org/whitepapers/CommunityInstallationGuide.pdf The CentOS path address it looks normal: https://www.bacula.org/packages/XXXXXXXXXXXXX/rpms/9.4.3/el7/x86_64/ Can you take a look? Best regards *Wanderlei Hüttel* http://www.bacula.com.br Em seg, 27 de mai de 2019 às 13:08, Davide Franco <bacula-...@dflc.ch> escreveu: > Hello Olivier, > > Bacula 9.4.3 packages are now available for Debian and Ubuntu, RedHat / > Centos version 6 and 7. > More platform like Fedora and OpenSuse will come soon. > > Sorry for the delay > > Best regards > > Davide > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:02 AM Olivier Delestre < > olivier.deles...@univ-rouen.fr> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> No news for the binaries of 9.4.3 ( bug fix release ) on >> https://bacula.org/packages/xxxxxxxxx ? >> >> Today, I use the rpms for CentOs with the bacula 9.4.2 >> >> Bye. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bacula-users mailing list >> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users >
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
