Hello Stefan,
Please submit a bug report on this. When running dbcheck, it is my opinion
that we should not be relying on .bvfs. If this is true (as it seems
from your
output) then I must see why and make sure it is justified. dbcheck
should always
be able to prune.
Best regards,
Kern
On 1/17/19 11:13 AM, Stefan Muenkner wrote:
Hi,
I have an almost 9 years running Bacula installation that accumulated more
than 800,000 orphaned paths entries in the database (around 5% of all
entries in the path table). dbcheck claims it cannot prune those when BVFS
is used.
....
9) Check for orphaned Path records
....
Select function number: 9
Pruning orphaned Path entries isn't possible when using BVFS.
....
Is there anything I can do about it?
Best regards
Stefan
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
