>>>>> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 19:50:43 +0200, Sebastian Suchanek said:
> 
> Am 04.09.2018 um 13:54 schrieb Martin Simmons:
> >>>>>> On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 21:40:02 +0200, Sebastian Suchanek said:
> >> Am 03.09.2018 um 21:15 schrieb Bill Arlofski:
> >> > 
> >> > [...]
> >> > Bacula honors the "InChanger" field for volumes when choosing a volume.
> >> > [...]
> >> 
> >> Well, that's the behaviour I would've expected - but Bacula didn't do so
> >> in my case.
> > 
> > Does the Storage definition in your Director's bacula-dir.conf contain
> > Autochanger = Yes?  The Director will ignore the InChanger field if this is
> > missing, even if the bacula-sd has it configured as an autochanger.
> > [...]
> 
> No, it wasn't. I added it and now it seems to work - thanks a lot!
> 
> The only thing that still puzzles me: When I just re-ran the aborted
> job, Bacula didn't ask for a tape that isn't in the changer, but didn't
> use the empty (and available) tape 1101 either. Instead, Bacula recycled
> the full volume 1103. (For further details, please see the output of
> "list media" in my previous e-mail.)
> Any ideas why *that* happened?

It should prefer a volume with the Append status, so that is strange.  Is the
Media.StorageID set correctly for tape 1101?

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to