On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 10:45:54 +0200 Radosław Korzeniewski wrote: > No, it is not correct. Check your email from > 24/08/2018, 11:53. The step 4. do not exist for > 'local-fd'.
It is correct. Please note that I said "In the past I have seen". Along the lines of the current discussion - sure, step 4 doesn't exist for 'local-fd'. But that doesn't mean my past experience is incorrect. Just clarifying :) > I checked the source code [...] Thanks for this! > [...] > > So, I think I proved above my suspicious with a > little of tune, because not the reload but any > estimate/job execution will create the new fileset > record when fileset was changed. OK. So I guess this means I have a weak memory about what I have seen in the past. (could be!) :) > You have to plan in advance that this changes are > worthless full backup and setting IFC parameter > means you are an expert, you know what you've done > and if something blows up it will be your > responsibility. Keep it in mind. Sure. I am very careful about changing filesets. In this case nothing was essentially changed (as rules). Just the file paths of the external rules changed. Anyway - thanks for the time you spent with me on this! Much appreciated :) -- George ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users