Oh, I much prefer having a false alert than a fire drill.  Good luck on
the upgrade.

Best regards,
Kern

On 08/29/2017 05:42 PM, Dan Langille wrote:

On Aug 29, 2017, at 10:20 AM, Kern Sibbald <k...@sibbald.com> wrote:

On 08/28/2017 07:17 PM, Dan Langille wrote:

Have you build the static client for 9.0.3?

In my testing, two things have come to light:

1 - file names have changed: static-bacula-fd (was bacula-fd-static) & static-bconsole (was bconsole-static).
I am very surprised, because I do not remember having changed these names.  It must be a result of backporting the Bacula Enterprise code, where they probably changed the names -- I find the new names more appropriate.

I am incorrect.  The names did not change.  More below

2 - binaries are not installed. Perhaps this is related to issue 1.
I suspect that you must issue a specific make install-xxx command to install those binaries.

I am in the process of packaging bacula9-server (and associated bacula9 ports) for FreeBSD.

The above misunderstandings arose because I had not completely converts the bacula-client-static port to work with bacula 9.  Packaging woes...

Please ignore this entire thread. Sorry for the noise.

-- 
Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to