Hello, The new signature file should now be loaded on Source Forge.
Thanks for informing me about this. Best regards, Kern On 11/28/2016 09:56 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello Adolf, > > Oh, thanks for pointing this out. I corrected the problem on the > bacula.org download, but forgot that the .sig file is also uploaded to > SourceForge, so it is still incorrect there. I will fix it today. > > Best regards, > Kern > > On 11/26/2016 06:31 PM, Adolf Belka wrote: >> Hi Kern, >> >> Thanks very much. At the moment the Sourceforge site still shows the >> sig file as the old date and it still comes up as a Bad signature >> (fresh download of both files). I also cleared the cache in my >> browser in case that was causing a problem but no change. >> Not sure if there is a delay before new uploaded files are visible on >> Sourceforge. Will check later today or tomorrow morning. >> >> Regards Adolf >> >> On 26/11/16 16:04, Kern Sibbald wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Yes, I did update the binary since the version had an annoying typo in >>> it, and as you found out, I forgot to release a new signature file. >>> Sorry for the inconvenience. I am really please to see people checking >>> it. Please continue to do so. I have now updated the source code >>> signature file. Please let me know if the signature file does not >>> correspond to the current source code (I have double checked it, but >>> ...). >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Kern >>> >>> On 11/26/2016 11:30 AM, Adolf Belka wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> Can anyone help on this. The bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz file still has a >>>> modification date after the signature file so still getting a bad >>>> signature result from it. >>>> >>>> I suspect the file is probably OK but the whole point of doing the >>>> signature check is to get confirmation that the file on the website >>>> hasn't been messed about with. >>>> >>>> Looking in the git repository then there was a modification made on >>>> 29th >>>> Sep 2016 to Tweak correct LSMDATE typo. Maybe this was done and the >>>> signature file not updated. >>>> >>>> If this question is going to the wrong mailing list please let me know. >>>> I couldn't find any other list that looked more correct as this doesn't >>>> seem to fit in the Bugs category. >>>> >>>> Adolf. >>>> >>>> On 21/11/16 13:07, Adolf Belka wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I downloaded the bacula-7.4.4,tar.gz and bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz.sig files >>>>> from sourceforge but when I checked the signature out it came back as >>>>> bad. >>>>> >>>>> All other files I have checked in the folder all came back good >>>>> with the >>>>> signature check. >>>>> >>>>> I noticed that the bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz had been modified on 2016-09-29 >>>>> while all the other files including bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz.sig had >>>>> modification dates of 2016-09-21. Would this date difference be >>>>> causing >>>>> the bad signature result. If yes, can someone update the signature >>>>> file >>>>> on sourceforge. If no, what could be wrong. >>>>> >>>>> Adolf Belka >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Bacula-users mailing list >>>> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users >>>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
