>>>>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:59:10 -0500, Dan Langille said: > > As a test, I scp'd over all the volumes for one job and timed it: > > real 167m15.956s > user 117m51.006s > sys 23m56.653s > > FWIW, these copies were done while a ZFS scrub was underway, so if anything, > the potential throughput is higher. > > The job above, took nearly 11 hours. Something is up. > > I tried another test run, just now, but cancelled it after the first two > Volumes were read; it was going at about the same rate as the full job > mentioned above. > > What might account for this vast difference?
You could try profiling it, e.g http://www.brendangregg.com/FlameGraphs/cpuflamegraphs.html#DTrace __Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
