Thanks, I'll be upgrading soon. What known bugs are in the update_bacula_tables scripts?
thanks, Stephen On 9/24/15 10:51 PM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 08:40:05AM -0700, Stephen Thompson wrote: >> >> All, >> >> I typically patch bacula pretty frequently, but I saw the somewhat >> unusual notice on the latest release notes that warns it may not be >> ready for use in production. How stable is it? I don't really have the >> resources to test this out, but rather would have to go straight to >> production with it. I could always roll back, but that might entail the >> recovery from dump of a 900GB database. Opinions? >> > > I upgraded five bacula instances of varying size over the last four > weeks or so, starting with the smallest (all were on 7.0.5 compiled > from source on CentOS), no issues so far apart from the little bugs in > the update_bacula_tables script. > > Cheers, Uwe > -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley Seismological Laboratory step...@seismo.berkeley.edu 215 McCone Hall #4760 Office: 510.664.9177 University of California, Berkeley Remote: 510.214.6506 (Tue,Wed) Berkeley, CA 94720-4760 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
