On 06/19/2015 03:58 PM, Andrew Noonan wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Yeah, I did that a few posts back.
heh, no idea how I missed that. I'll chalk it up to a very busy week! > Unfortunately, there isn't a > keen mapping that specifically connects the SCSI devices to the > internal drive numbering that the changer uses, so commands against > the changer (mtx) would use the drive number, but commands against the > drive (mt) would use the devices. Once Ana saw that my "drive 1" was > showing ONLINE when a tape was loaded and not my drive 0, she > connected the dots and had me swap the devices. Glad to see it is working correctly now. Ana has been very busy in here lately! Thank you Ana! :) > Rest assured that the > actual device names I swapped are the /dev/tape/by-id names, as I > agree with you that they're a much better way to handle things. Yes, I think this is the only way to go when there are more than one SCSI tape and/or changer. Actually, these days I use the by-id node even when there is one drive. I think it is a good habit. Bill -- Bill Arlofski http://www.revpol.com/bacula -- Not responsible for anything below this line -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users