Hello,
You are entitled to your opinion, but I find that such opinions don't carry as much weight as they would if you give some reason for it. My reason is simple: Bacula Systems has spent quite a lot of money (over $1 Million) paying salaries to develop code for Bacula Enterprise. It has given a very large chunk of that code (somewhere between 50-80%) back to the community and will give much more over time. One of the persons involved in the lawsuit took proprietary code developed by Bacula Systems and released it in the public Bareos git repository without authorization. He apparently has in his possession something around an additional 100,000 lines of proprietary code that he could also release. I have devoted most of my time since 1998 to open source and spent 15 years developing the Bacula community version, which is 100% open source, and by creating up Bacula Systems, much more code than I could ever create alone will be contributed to the Bacula community project. I believe that anyone who steals proprietary code and releases it publicly through an open source fork (Bareos) has very poor ethical standards and is damaging the whole open source community. Best regards, Kern On 01.02.2015 18:33, Ben Erridge wrote:
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users