On 11/26/2014 08:39 AM, Bill Arlofski wrote: > ---[ tl;dr verson ]--- > When considering volumes for the expected volume of an upcoming job, Bacula > appears to be ignoring the Job/JobDef options: > > Full Backup Pool = > Incremental Backup Pool = > Differential Backup Pool = > > And only considers volumes from the "Pool = " line in the Job/JobDefs.
No help here but I had it go (using your naming) from c0_0005_0067 to c0_0006_0067 instead of c0_0005_0068 after a problem of some kind (I forget what, exactly). That was with only one pool, so I wonder if the problem is in the JobDefs. My impression is bacula's algorithm for choosing next volume is fcsked up beyond understanding. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
