Hello,
2014-09-15 12:43 GMT+02:00 Luc Van der Veken <luc...@wimionline.com>:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> My current configuration backs up to a NAS, and later though a migration
> job moves completed backups to tape for off-site storage.
>
>
>
> That puts up a dilemma: copy, or move?
>
>
>
> When I copy the backups to tape, I understand that only the original (NAS)
> version remains in the database, which would complicate things if ever a
> backup has to be restored from tape (find out which tape contains the files
> you are looking for, then scan that tape to get its catalog, etc.).
>
No. All copies goes to database as well, but they are indirectly available
for restore and are promoted as a main backup only when original job
expire. I could be wrong about it, but it was working as described last
time I've check.
best regards
--
Radosław Korzeniewski
rados...@korzeniewski.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
