On May 1, 2014, at 1:45 PM, Alexander E. Fischer <a...@raxys.net> wrote:
> Hello, > > when I first noticed that the Bareos fork has implemented storage to > storage copy jobs I wanted to use that because it would make a lot of > sense for my backup scenario. Only after spending quite a lot of time I > found out that my problems regarding Bareos' storage to storage copy > jobs seem to be related to having TLS enabled for all communications. I > think their implementation just doesn't work for TLS and is therefore > completely unusable to me. > > As Bacula has an comparable feature now as well, and getting that > version to run on all of my systems will be quite some work as well, I > would like to know if Bacula 7's storage to storage copy jobs actually > work nicely with TLS, before trying to set it all up. Has anyone > first-hand knowledge about this? What do the developers say about this? Have you tried it? I’m still on 5 for at least a few weeks. SD to SD is something I want to do too. -- Dan Langille - http://langille.org
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity • Requirements for releasing software faster • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
