>>>>> On Fri, 09 May 2014 18:22:45 +0300, Jari Fredriksson said: > > 08.05.2014 20:29, Mark kirjoitti: > > Hello, > > > > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Jari Fredriksson <ja...@iki.fi > > <mailto:ja...@iki.fi>> wrote: > > > > 08.05.2014 15:12, Richard Fox kirjoitti: > > > Hi Jari & all, > > > > > > On Thu, 8 May 2014, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > > > > > >> CentOS 6 has bacula 5.0.0 which has a bug so that it prunes > > jobs older > > >> than 43 years, no matter how it was defined for director. > > > > > > I don't have an alternate repo to offer you, I just wanted to ask if > > "43 years" is a typo, or if you really have retention times set that > > go beyond that time frame? More a curiosity than anything, I've > > certainly heard of people with 7 or 10 year retentions, but you're > > talking about it being an issue if jobs you run today get purged in > > 2057? Sorry, it just really piqued my interest because it's so far > > out of any use cases I've heard of. > > > > Mark > > I have Job retention set to 1 year. But Bacula 5.0.0 translates ANY > value to > > 09-May 07:03 wellington-dir JobId 423: Begin pruning Jobs older than 43 > years 4 months 19 days 4 hours 3 mins 39 secs.
I think it uses the correct retention, but it prints it incorrectly. __Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity • Requirements for releasing software faster • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
