>> Interesting idea but it will then do more compression than it's needed - for >> example, Bacula needs to compress only new/modified files. In the way you >> suggested, kernel will need to compress everything again with every >> VirtualFull backup. >> > >Most of the filesystems that compress do that on a block level. So it >will not recompress the entire disk volume when you append.
But VirtualFull is creating new volumes from old volumes so kernel will need to compress it again. Bacula not. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
