Dear all,
I'm currently completely redefining my Bacula setup and plan now to use Virtual
Full backups
for some of my bigger servers.
I've now defined the necessary two pools but am unsure now if it is a good
practice to
create a "loop" in these pools:
Pool {
Name = Pool1
....
Next Pool = Pool2
}
Pool {
Name = Pool2
...
Next Pool = Pool1
}
I googled a lot and found some concerns that these configuration can cause a
deadlock, is that right?
But at other places I found this setup recommended...
So I'm now completely unsure how to proceed.
If not using that loop I found that the Virtual Full backups alternate between
the two pools but the
differential and incremental are always done to the first pool. What I would
like is that all diff and incr
backups are done to that pool that has the most recent full backup and I think
that will be possible
by defining the loop above, right?
So.... how do you configure your Virtual Full? What is the best practice for
it?
And... how likely is it that a deadlock can/will occur?
Thanks a lot!!
Christian
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
