Masopust, Christian wrote (2013/02/12): > As there are lots of files within the filesets to be backuped > (appr. 6000000) I would kindly ask you about your experiences > with accurate backups.
Hello, you can try it yourself - configure it and do "estimate". I tried it with client with 15 000 000 files in a backup and I changed my questions from "time" theme (because everything faster than full backup is good for me and I expect, that it has to be faster) to "client cpu and memory used" theme. And I'm not happy from backup client using > 2 or 4 GB, so I stopped my experiments with accurate backups for now. However, I would be very very happy, if I did some mistake and if memory usage is not so bad as I have seen (something like streaming - get new attributes all the time, remember just currently needed information and delete already used data - to have just small information window on client side). > How long will it last to send the accurate information > of appr. 6000000 files and directories to the file daemon? I closed my experiments with that it would be somewhat similar to waiting on interactive restore, which is about 12 minutes for 15 000 000 files in a backup in my case. (Is there a chance to perform better with Postgres instead of MySQL? I saw many suggestiong about Postgres instead of MySQL because of writing, but what about reading?) Best regards. -- Rudolf Cejka <cejkar at fit.vutbr.cz> http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
