On 01/03/13 08:22, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
> On 3/01/2013 11:44 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> [SNIP]
>
>> Keep in mind that ZFS block-level deduplication is very expensive in
>> terms of RAM.
> I'd put it as *any* block-level de-duplication is RAM intensive... I'd
> be very interested if someone had an algorithm that was not RAM
> intensive - and didn't take forever to accept data! :-)
Well, true. :)
--
Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
ala...@caerllewys.net ala...@metrocast.net p...@co.ordinate.org
Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, SQL wrangler, Free Stater
It's not the years, it's the mileage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
