On 2012-11-15 23:46, Gary R, Schmidt wrote: > On 16.11.2012 13:52, Wouter van Marle wrote: > [SNIP] >> Result: yesterday I moved a big mail folder with subfolders, causing >> the > You *moved* a directory, and you are surprised that the files in it > are > being backed up?
If I recall correctly, this has long been described as a 'bug' by some, but not as you describe. From http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Configuring_Director.html "In addition, if you move a directory rather than copy it, the files in it do not have their modification time (st_mtime) or their attribute change time (st_ctime) changed. As a consequence, those files will probably not be backed up by an Incremental or Differential backup which depend solely on these time stamps. If you move a directory, and wish it to be properly backed up, it is generally preferable to copy it, then delete the original." What we are seeing here is the opposite of that. > Bacula has never seen these files in that location before, if it > *didn't* back them up that would be a total failure. What is described above is not the expected behavior. In fact, it's the opposite of the expected behavior, given that Bacula, by default, use mtime to decide what to backup with an incremental/differential. It does not use 'have I seen this file here before'. I believe that's an 'accurate backup' option. -- Dan Langille - http://langille.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
