On Oct 18, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Florent Krieg wrote:

> Hi Dan, 
> 
> Thanks a lot for your help, it has gone much clearer to me. 
> I still have a few questions left: 
> 
> Le 17/10/2012 21:55, Dan Langille a écrit : 
>> On Oct 17, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Florent Krieg wrote: 
>> 
>>> Hi there! 
>>> 
>>> We are currently using bacula for a while (3/4 years maybe) to backup many 
>>> servers (VMs as weel as physical machines) on a storage server (volumes are 
>>> not tapes, but basically only labelled files of 1GB size). 
>>> 
>>> We don't have a complicated architecture, even if we backup every night 
>>> around 50 servers. The only thing we need is to be able to restore one or 
>>> more files, but having different version of the same file is not important 
>>> to us. 
>>> 
>>> So here is what we used to have (until we realized we were wrong): 
>>> - 2 full backups a month (1st and 3rd weeks of the month, on Saturday 
>>> night) 
>>> - incremental backups otherwise 
>>> This means for a month, for instance: 
>>> FIIIIII-IIIIIII-FIIIIII-IIIIII 
>>> 
>>> Everything seemed to be OK until I tried to restore something yesterday. 
>>> 
>>> The problem I found is that when we initially setuped bacula, storage was a 
>>> huge constraint (we hadn't any storage server actually) and every retention 
>>> parameters were set to 7 days: 
>>> - Client: file/job/volume retention = 7 days 
>>> - Pool (the same pool is used for full and incr backups, which is ok in our 
>>> case, am I right?): volume retention = 7 days 
>> Well, it's OK, but the problem is, any backup more that 7 days will not be 
>> listed 
>> in the Catalog.  It may well exist on disk, but without the Catalog entries, 
>> there 
>> is no *EASY* way to restore that backup.  And ease-of-restore is exactly 
>> what 
>> the Catalog is there for. 
>> 
>>> Ok so it's quite obvious we had a huge problem there. To my mind, we should 
>>> have no problem to restore anything the week following the full backup but 
>>> there were still two blacks weeks in the month where we couldn't restore in 
>>> a proper way (we could restore as best effort though... What I actually 
>>> did). 
>>> 
>>> Thus to rethink our bacula configuration I've tried since to read bacula 
>>> (5.0.0) manual and forums on the Internet, without being able to clearly 
>>> understand what is the purpose of each retention time. Logically I would 
>>> set 
>>> the retentions to 14 days everywhere, and this should solves the problem, 
>>> but I am not sure of that and as I could experiment, I'd prefer understand 
>>> what I'm doing. 
>> Retention is all about the Catalog, not necessarily the backup. 
>> 
>> Retention is: how long do you want to record this backup in the Catalog. 
>> 
>> I recommend keeping all retentions the same: Volume, Job, File. 
> Ok. 
> 
>> 
>>> Could somebody point me to a manual section that would explain me (without 
>>> going into the deep details of Bacula) how to set either: 
>>> - client: file/job/volume retention parameters? 
>> Volume retention is not a Client attribute.  Job and File are. 
> Yes sorry, this is how we defined them in the config files. 
> 'show job=SERVER_job' in bconsole drove me in the wrong me, showing me stuff 
> as: 
> --> Client: name=SUPER-VIL-1_fd address=super-vil-1.mgt.sewan.fr FDport=9102 
> MaxJobs=1 
>       JobRetention=7 days  FileRetention=7 days  AutoPrune=1 
>  --> Pool: name=SUPER-VIL-1_pool PoolType=Backup 
>       use_cat=1 use_once=0 cat_files=1 
>       max_vols=0 auto_prune=1 VolRetention=7 days 
>       VolUse=0 secs recycle=1 LabelFormat=SUPER-VIL-1- 
>       CleaningPrefix=*None* LabelType=0 
>       RecyleOldest=0 PurgeOldest=0 ActionOnPurge=0 
>       MaxVolJobs=10 MaxVolFiles=0 MaxVolBytes=1073741824 
>       MigTime=0 secs MigHiBytes=0 MigLoBytes=0 
>       JobRetention=0 secs FileRetention=4447866 years 9 months 27 days 6 
> hours 46 mins 
> 
> Where do these values come from? 

My guess: default values.  Those are the entries stored in the database tables.

> 
>> 
>> I would search for all mentions of retention here 
>> http://www.bacula.org/5.2.x-manuals/en/main/main/Configuring_Director.html#SECTION0022130000000000000000
>>  
>> 
>> NOTE this is the same file as the next URL, just a different section 
>> 
>>> - pool: which retention parameters are available and if they are redundant 
>>> or not with the others above? 
>> Volume retention is specified in the Pool resource. I would search for all 
>> mentions 
>> of retention here: 
>> 
>> http://www.bacula.org/5.2.x-manuals/en/main/main/Configuring_Director.html#SECTION0022150000000000000000
>>  
> Thanks for the link, I have read both sections carefully and I think I got 
> the point. 
> 
>> 
>>> Also, I know the scenario is really simple compared to most of yours, but 
>>> if 
>>> somebody already achieved something similar (2 or 1 full a month and then 
>>> incrementals), I'd be very greatful if he'd explain to me how to do it. 
>> Decide how far back you want to be able to restore a file, then go from 
>> there. 
>> 
>> Two months?  Two years?  Decide that, then set your retention values.  
>> You'll need to update your 
>> resources, then update your Pools based on that, using the update command in 
>> bconsole.  But that you can ask about 
>> later. 
>> 
>> Read all that, then get back to the list with any questions. 
> Let me know if I am wrong: 
> Let's consider that when a Full backup is done, I don't mind previous 
> backups. 
> A full backup is a reliable reference to me (basically backups are just used 
> in case of emergency in our environment, so if a full backup of a working 
> server is available, that's fine). 
> Our schedule policy is: 
> Schedule { 
>   Name = "NightlySave" 
>   Run = Level=Full 1st,3rd sat at 06:05 
>   Run = Level=Incremental mon-fri,sun at 04:05 
>   Run = Level=Incremental 2nd,4th,5th sat at 04:05 
> } 
> Thus, retention times of 'time inbetween two full backups' should definitely 
> fit our needs, right? Say 7+7+1(error margin)=15d ..? 

I'd go with keeping more than one just full backup.  I'd be keeping 3 or 4 if 
you can.  Things will go wrong.  Plus, if a file is mangled in Mar, and you 
don't find out until Nov, you have no backups.

> Two questions that I have now are: 
> 
> 1. We have all AutoPrune/AutoPurge/Recycle/... parameters set to Yes. In that 
> case, the retention times are directly involved in how long we keep the 
> backup Volumes, right? 

Yes.

> Moreover, we don't have any max volume files for each pool therefore if a new 
> volume is needed for a backup, a new one will be created right? 

Yes

> 
> 2. With 7 days retention times, if I list job a server: 
> *list job=HSS-VIL-1_job 
> +--------+---------------+---------------------+------+-------+-----------+-----------------+-----------+
>  
> | JobId  | Name          | StartTime           | Type | Level | JobFiles  | 
> JobBytes        | JobStatus | 
> +--------+---------------+---------------------+------+-------+-----------+-----------------+-----------+
>  
> | 40,840 | HSS-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-06 22:03:57 | B    | F     | 1,681,621 | 
> 156,228,704,503 | T         | 
> | 40,893 | HSS-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-07 10:58:43 | B    | I     | 3,066 |     
> 325,259,836 | T         | 
> | 40,946 | HSS-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-08 04:12:06 | B    | I     | 2,150 |     
> 119,735,689 | T         | 
> | 40,999 | HSS-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-09 04:14:28 | B    | I     | 8,345 |     
> 466,134,754 | T         | 
> | 41,052 | HSS-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-10 04:15:33 | B    | I     | 11,125 |     
> 946,012,469 | T         | 
> | 41,110 | HSS-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-11 04:15:22 | B    | I     | 8,898 |     
> 604,906,727 | T         | 
> | 41,163 | HSS-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-12 04:15:27 | B    | I     | 10,610 |     
> 613,376,814 | T         | 
> | 41,216 | HSS-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-13 04:15:58 | B    | I     | 7,604 |     
> 530,114,112 | T         | 
> | 41,269 | HSS-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-14 04:16:40 | B    | I     | 4,086 |     
> 554,999,485 | T         | 
> | 41,322 | HSS-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-15 04:15:49 | B    | I     | 3,275 |     
> 198,191,930 | T         | 
> | 41,375 | HSS-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-16 04:14:26 | B    | I     | 11,713 |     
> 601,523,941 | T         | 
> | 41,429 | HSS-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-17 04:15:53 | B    | I     | 18,210 |     
> 838,659,657 | T         | 
> | 41,483 | HSS-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-18 04:15:46 | B    | I     | 11,810 |     
> 575,001,874 | T         | 
> +--------+---------------+---------------------+------+-------+-----------+-----------------+-----------+
>  
> Why do I have information about the last 12 days? 
> Isn't the purpose of JobRetention to clean it? 

I don't know.  More investigation would be required.

> 
> It seems to work on another host though: 
> *list job=SUPER-VIL-1_job 
> +--------+-----------------+---------------------+------+-------+----------+-------------+-----------+
>  
> | JobId  | Name            | StartTime           | Type | Level | JobFiles | 
> JobBytes    | JobStatus | 
> +--------+-----------------+---------------------+------+-------+----------+-------------+-----------+
>  
> | 41,179 | SUPER-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-12 04:36:44 | B    | I |       40 |   
> 4,575,403 | T         | 
> | 41,232 | SUPER-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-13 04:35:19 | B    | I |       67 |   
> 4,709,002 | T         | 
> | 41,285 | SUPER-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-14 04:27:37 | B    | I |       53 |   
> 4,424,132 | T         | 
> | 41,338 | SUPER-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-15 04:30:22 | B    | I |       49 |   
> 4,526,834 | T         | 
> | 41,391 | SUPER-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-16 04:42:28 | B    | I |      105 |  
> 45,807,762 | T         | 
> | 41,445 | SUPER-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-17 04:39:48 | B    | F     | 38,183 | 
> 995,992,505 | T         | 
> | 41,501 | SUPER-VIL-1_job | 2012-10-18 04:47:52 | B    | I |       27 |   
> 4,474,961 | T         | 
> +--------+-----------------+---------------------+------+-------+----------+-------------+-----------+
>  
> 
> A full backup was done two days ago because the full backup of the first week 
> was pruned, I reckon. 
> 
> 
> Thanks again in advance! 
> Florent 
> 
>> 
>>> Thanks in advance everybody and sorry if I feel like I am searching 
>>> information at the wrong place. 
>> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct_______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

-- 
Dan Langille - http://langille.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to